So, you think that Obama genuine?  That he's the right choice to lead this country?  Are you sure?  Did you know he's lied to you more times than any other politician.  Okay, nobody can prove that, but one by one, his lies are getting exposed.

Obama claimed that his campaign has no ties to the corrupt ACORN.  Well, he lied. 

The Obama campaign says it has "no ties" to ACORN, a ludicrous assertion given that the campaign has disclosed to the FEC a payment of $800,000 to ACORN's subsidiary, Citizens Services Inc. The depth of the relationship between the Obama campaign and ACORN was revealed today when a former ACORN staffer testified in a lawsuit brought by the Pennsylvania Republican Party...

...the Obama campaign gave ACORN a list of donors who had given the maximum allowable contributions to Obama and urged ACORN to contact those donors to get them to help Obama some more by contributing to ACORN.

Not only does he lie about it, but ACORN turns out to be an extension of his campaign.  I wonder how this will play given the current campaign laws.  Of course, I have serious doubts that Congress will do anything.  He IS congress. 

DONT vote for this charlatan.  We already know there'll be a bunch of ACORN nuts casting illegal votes for him.

Gore is nothing but a two-bit liar and an opportunist money grubber.  How do I know?  Well, take this article in the National Post.  Lorne Garner does a good job at taking recent ideas and evidence that completely refutes the infantile idea that human produced green-house gasses impact the climate more than other factors like the Sun.

"So, given that August was the first month since 1913 in which no sunspot activity was recorded -- none -- and during which solar winds were at a 50-year low, [Brazilian meteorologist Eugenio Hackbart] was not surprised that Brazilians were suffering (for them) a brutal cold snap. 'This is no coincidence,' he said as he scoffed at the notion that manmade carbon emissions had more impact than the sun and oceans on global climate."

Dr Hackbart isn't the only one who's come to this realization.  There's more and more people who are really looking into the emerging science of global climate.  And it seems that the more honest they are with their research, the more we'll see that we are on this roller coaster with no way to impact it.

"Also in September, American Craig Loehle, a scientist who conducts computer modelling on global climate change, confirmed his earlier findings that the so-called Medieval Warm Period (MWP) of about 1,000 years ago did in fact exist and was even warmer than 20th-century temperatures.

Prior to the past decade of climate hysteria and Kyoto hype, the MWP was a given in the scientific community. Several hundred studies of tree rings, lake and ocean floor sediment, ice cores and early written records of weather -- even harvest totals and censuses --confirmed that the period from 800 AD to 1300 AD was unusually warm, particularly in Northern Europe.

But in order to prove the climate scaremongers' claim that 20th-century warming had been dangerous and unprecedented -- a result of human, not natural factors -- the MWP had to be made to disappear. So studies such as Michael Mann's 'hockey stick,' in which there is no MWP and global temperatures rise gradually until they jump up in the industrial age, have been adopted by the UN as proof that recent climate change necessitates a reordering of human economies and societies.

Dr. Loehle's work helps end this deception."

The main point that I want to make is that the study of climate change is new.  It's an emerging science.  Conclusions from many of the recent studies that point to human affect of climate change are based off of this emerging and inaccurate science.  Any decision based on those studies will invariantly be a very costly wrong decision.